Kate's Comment

Thoughts on British ICT, energy & environment, cloud computing and security from Memset's MD

The business of going green

Does your business take green IT seriously? Well it should, because ignoring climate change could cost you money and harm your credibility. (originally published in .NET magazine.)

There are now over 1.1 billion computers in operation worldwide, collectively producing about one billion tonnes of CO2 through their electricity requirements. E-waste is serious headache too with computers, mobile phones and electronic gadgets now accounting for 5% of the world’s garbage (UNEP).

But surely small IT companies don’t need to be worrying about that kind of thing? Actually, they do – there are solid reasons why all businesses should be going greener, and not just because of the do-gooder’s warm fuzzy feelings to be had! Over 70% of PCs will not be recycled when disposed of over the next five years, and globally we will dispose of 512 million. We are now legally obliged to dispose of PC equipment properly, and that normally incurs charges. Thankfully there is a free and simple, if underused, alternative; lots of people in the world are in dire need of our “outdated” computers, so donate them to the likes of Computer Aid International. They do thoroughly clean the hard drive(s), but if you are of a paranoid persuasion perhaps scrub them first with something like Darik’s Boot and Nuke.

Perhaps more importantly, consumers and businesses are increasingly taking note of how the products and services they use impact the environment. We became the UK’s first carbon neutral Web host last Summer and that has definitely helped us win more business, which is also probably why so many other dedicated server hosts are following suit.

Carbon offsetting

Things like travel, electricity usage and product manufacture have a “carbon footprint”; the quantity of greenhouse gases directly or indirectly produced as a result of those activities. Most activities are impossible to make 100% green, but you can offset the effective carbon impact by investing in carbon sequestration projects (eg. planting trees) or in greener power generation facilities (eg. wind farms), thus becoming “carbon neutral”.

Organisations like the CarbonNeutral Company and the Carbon Trust can guide you through offsetting, and it is neither expensive nor difficult. For example, an average small office with 10 staff might have equivalent emissions of 20 tonnes CO2/year, which would probably only cost around £200/year to offset.

As well as giving you more credibility in today’s increasingly enviro-friendly world, taking a few hours to review your carbon footprint can lead to some worthwhile cost savings. A simple example is turning off (or hibernating if, like me, you hate rebooting and getting back to where you were each morning) your PC at night. A recent study by Fujitsu estimated that the UK alone wastes £123m on electricity powering PCs left on out-of-hours. See the Energy Saving Trust’s site for more general energy-efficiency tips.

Virtually greener

Carbon offsetting is all good stuff, but when it comes to IT power consumption, prevention is better than cure. Demand for high-availability, centralised server resource is growing relentlessly, and high-density computing uses a lot of energy. Even a base-spec 1U rackmount server will burn 100-200 Watts continuously, and once you fill a few racks and add in cooling requirements you are looking at a whopping electricity bill! With energy prices doubling every few years datacentres’ power consumption is fast becoming a major issue for IT business, and is now the main cost underlying server hosting.

The oddity from our perspective is that the vast bulk of servers in our datacentres idle most of the time, with perhaps 90% never getting close to full capacity. While many applications are best hosted on their own dedicated server (better security, for example), few need the full resource of a modern multi-core, gigahertz machine. That is where virtualisation comes in; the latest generation of virtual machines, using the hardware-assisted virtualisation in new AMD and Intel’s chips (eg. our Miniserver™ technology), are operationally indistinguishable from a physical server but use 5-20% of the electricity. The reduced power and hardware costs give you significant savings while not costing anything you actually needed in the first place, and at the same time you are tackling climate change.

It can be argued that all such measures are a dribble in the ocean, and some have serious doubts about the efficacy of our whole approach to climate change. However, being more climate-friendly is not difficult for most IT businesses and almost certainly helps, so can you really afford to ignore the risks, or miss out on the benefits of going greener?

6 comments

  1. anonymous May 31, 2007 02:54 We run some of the greenest data centers on the planet at RF and we are working closely with some providers on new technology that will blow you away on how green a data center can get. The ability for a company to say that their data is hosted on low energy usage servers (relatively speaking of course) in data centers that use green energy and green methodologies will be big pr factors in the future and will affect their attractiveness to investors. Keep an eye on us Kate there are some really big things coming in the not too distant future but I am not free to discuss then publicly at this point. Check out the two blog posts I did on the RF company site regarding green data centers


    Regards
    Doug Alder
  2. uberseehandel May 31, 2007 11:19 Now lets hope lots of people read this and do something about it.

    In the last 24 hours I have heard advocates for mass adoption of veganism to counter the green house gas emissions from livestock raised on farms, and the unilateral capping of airport expansion and punative taxation of cheap flights because of the damage done by cheap airlines. This loony fringe is commanding attention far beyond that which it deserves on its merits.

    What you are advocating is far more prqactical and logical, is not devisave nor do we have to sign up for a bunch or elitist or feelgood beliefs. Its good to see practical measures being advocated.

    Robin
  3. Kate May 31, 2007 12:20 Actually I do remember being intrigued by a diagram of your new site mentioning something about geothermal power... your blog looks good too - I will definitely have to keep an eye on what you are doing.

    You do, admittedly, have the advantage of huge amounts of space and arguably less planning restrictions (being on an overpopulated island can be a pain sometimes!), but I am sure there are some good lessons to be learnt from what you Canadians are up to! ;)
  4. Kate May 31, 2007 13:16 Practical measures are good, yes, but frankly even those I propose above are rather feeble in the grander scheme. Personally, I still think we should be focussing more on nuclear power as a long-term solution.

    At least some of the above measures can gain support and will help in the short term, but we still need to fight the deep-rooted and not very valid prejudice against nuclear power since it probably is going to be the real environmental saviour.
  5. anonymous Oct 21, 2007 12:24 I would like to think that carbon offsetting will save the planet, and green hosting (http://www.greenhostingreviews.com) will help (well i think it might slow it down a bit), but the facts of human nature remain. People arn't going to change the way they live until global warming affects them personally (and by then it may be too late), it will also be these same people who are the first to complain that nothing was done to stop global warming!
  6. anonymous Aug 11, 2008 11:09 Personally I think that as stated earlier in this thread the key solution to reducing global carbon emissions created by the IT industry is by implimenting greater energy efficiency solutions. Carbon offsetting will change things on a global level but if a company does nothing to change it behaviour but purchase carbon credits then it will still be making an impact locally. Not to metntion not reducing its local demands on energy.

    Carbon offsetting is a quick win for companies, or so they think. But really is it?

    A good Green IT strategy is the key.

    The IT industry, and people in general the worl over have been so wasteful of energy and this is why we are in the position we are in today. If we only used what we needed then all may be okay and we could also reduce carbon emissions to a level that would possibly stop us tipping over the edge of no return.

    Energy efficiency is the key.

    Also lets not forget about the energy used in the manufacturing and production of the equipment we purchase. Purchasing from companies that have greener product manufacturing processes will also help reduce your companies overall impact.

    Small changes can make a huge impact. We just need to be less greedy and use only what we need. Kate mentioned a good point earlier that we have only been using around a quarter and sometimes less of the overall capabilities of an average server. Its only now that we are starting to realise and become aware of wasted storage equalling wasted electricity.

    Energy efficiency also means good business and can help save large amounts of money, which is always handy when running a business. Its a win, win at the end of the day save money and be greener and reduce your environmental impact. but please no green washing.

    Adam Clamp

    The Green IT Company

Add your comment

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin